The website of India’s Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MHFW) gives us the lowdown on the status of Covid-19 in the country, in numbers. The status on the morning of 30th November is:
|Tests done||13,95,03, 803|
|Population (inserted by me)||1,35,26,00,000|
Numbers often do not leave room for doubt. Everything else seems to.
Of course we know:
- This data would include tests initiated by an individual as well as tests done as part of random testing and sero surveys or as part of some regulation, like asking air travellers to produce a negative certificate before boarding. It is possible that self-initiated tests have a higher incidence of positive cases, but that cannot be established from this data.
- Cases reported as positive include asymptomatic ones as well. The person would have gone about normal life without feeling any difference till told he was a ‘case.’
- There could be many untested cases that could not be established as Covid-19 cases. Even deaths. Though the government did put in a protocol of testing dead bodies for Covid-19.
- While the cases and deaths and recoveries are all person specific, and should not have any double counting, it is possible some people have been tested more than once. Elon Musk apparently had 4 tests in one day with the verdict of him being infected split right down the middle. Thankfully Mr. Musk is not part of the numbers on the MHFW website.
For one, Covid-19 has broadened our daily-use vocabulary. Who used, or had even heard of, social distancing or quarantine or self-quarantine or community spread or flatten the curve or contact tracing or super spreader or antibodies or asymptomatic or case fatality rate or herd immunity or incubation period or PPE or shelter in place or ventilator. Rarely, if ever, have so many words been added to the common man’s vocabulary in one year.
The government has been able to make guidelines and rules. Unopposed. For once, they have been encouraged, nay forced to.
- Guidelines for international arrivals. Then revised guidelines for international arrivals.
- Standard Operating Procedure for passenger movement post embarkation.
- Travel Advisory. Additional Travel Advisory. Another additional travel advisory.
- Guidelines for workplaces. Then updated guidelines for workplaces.
- Guidelines on containment of local transmission.
Hmmm. Not quite sure.
Before going deeper, let me state clearly that I am not a doctor. I probably won’t even know my Femur from my Tibia, assuming the body still has bones by these names, that I picked up in Biology class in school many moons back.
I am trying to make sense of the paranoia surrounding Covid-19, instead of playing dead and blindly following the blind. The blind who make loud noises to hide their blindness.
Have an ache, pop a pill.
Have a sniffle, pop a pill.
Have a reaction to a pill, pop a pill.
Unable to fight the next illness because it is now dependent on pills…you know the answer.
Of course, the rest of the world should do the same. Else they are irresponsible.
With the government, and big business, happily complying and salivating at the prospect of total control over the lives of people. Who you are. Where you live. What you ate today. Where you went today afternoon. Sorry, you cannot board that flight because the last vaccine shot was on Tuesday, 5th May, more than six months back.
You asked for protection, did you not?
Comfortingly, one of the vaccines mankind has set its hopes on has shown success rates of 90% apparently through a dosage combination arrived at scientifically as the result of an accident.
And all vaccines, at least from a lay person’s perspective, are aiming at a moving target, as apparently the virus keeps mutating while jumping from one human to another. So, the shot you eventually get might be effectively protecting you against a virus that was there last year. I think it has a 100% chance of success against a virus no longer there.
The data shared earlier is for a period of 9 months, give or take, since the, issue, started around end February and we have almost rounded off November.
I have annualised the data to make it more easy to understand and compare, since historical data is not normally be maintained for 9 months and 11 days or any such odd period. If 100 people have contracted Covid in 9 months, assuming the same rate of infection, for the full year, the number would be 100×12/9 = 133.
The annualised data now looks like:
|Population (inserted by me, probably increased since then)||1,35,26,00,000|
In a year, less than 1% of the population would be infected with Covid-19, and 0.0139% of the population will die. In other words, 0.139 people in a thousand or 139 people in a million will die of Covid-19. Based on 1,81,600 projected Covid-19 deaths in a year.
How does this compare with other causes of death in India?
178832 (1.78 lac) people are killed in road accidents in a year
15.4 lacs on account of Heart disease
7.2 lacs due to Diarrhoeal disease
5.1 because of Respiratory system issue
4.5 lacs owing to Tuberculosis (TB)
2.5 lacs caused by Diabetes
This is based on a study published in the Times of India in March 2020.
As many people die of heart diseases in India daily, as do people of Corona in the whole world.
But comparisons are odious. Of the above, only TB is communicable.
What should we compare with, if at all? What about influenza, the flu? The common flu. Which seems to be the closest cousin of Covid-19. Everyone in India gets it. Many get it multiple times a year perhaps.
Why don’t we have a comparison of Covid-19 with the common flu? We have many articles and reports and opinions, but little ‘data.’
Maybe because common flu is just that, common. According to the Centers for Diseas Control and Prevention (CDC) of the US, “each death due to influenza in the U.S. does not have to be reported, so there is never a direct count…Conversely, each death due to COVID-19 is being recorded.” In India, even testing the dead for the infection.
So, how does one get perspective? Should one bother about perspective? As they say, perspective is not popular at the best of times.
No answers. All I have is questions.
If two groups are constructed of a million people each, with a comparable distribution of age, precondition, etc., and exposed, one group of one million people to Covid-19 and the other to seasonal flu, in each group:
A. How many will not contract the virus?
B. How many will contract without symptoms?
C. How many will contract with symptoms?
D. How many in each of the three categories above will die?
E. People in which of the categories above, A, B and C, will be transmitters? For what duration?
G. If category A did not contract the virus, can they be considered to be immune? For how long?
H. Will people in categories B and C become immune as a result? For how long?
On to the vaccine now. The one with a 90% success rate.
It now seems increasingly apparent that everyone will need to take the vaccine.
Like to eat out? Have you taken the shot?
Fly to Mumbai? Taken the shot?
Attend college? Taken the shot?
Ride the metro? Taken the shot?
Without a vaccine, in a million people, 9590 get infected, and 990410 don’t. And 139 die.
After the vaccine is given to all million, whether they want it or not, and possibly lowering their immunity a notch for future mutations, at the 90% rate of success, 900,000 will be immune and 100,000 will not be. Which 100,000 we don’t know.
Out of these 100,000, 959 will get infected, and 13.9 will die. Which 13.9 we don’t know.